Welcome Page
 Ashley Page
 Spotlight front page
previous issue


JANUARY, 1991

IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT:

DATES OF SERVICES AT ASHLEY AND IN DUNEDIN:

 It has been decided that for the future services in Dunedin will be once a month.In order to make the dates easier to remember, we have settled on the First Sunday of every month, except January. This will begin on Sunday, February 3, 1991; and will continue till further notice.

  For services at Ashley, the result will be that the 11a.m. Sunday Liturgy will be held every Sunday throughout the year except the first in each month. We hope this will be easy to remember, and avoid the occasional disappointments when people have come out expecting a service when there was none; and perhaps also avoid so much staying away from services when they are on...

  Our son Jeremy is to be married in Motueka on our Lazarus Saturday (Latin Holy Saturday, March 30). This will unfortunately mean that there cannot be a service at Ashley on March 31, Palm Sunday. However, the rest of Holy Week will be observed in the Church at Ashley, including certainly the services at 6.30 p.m. on Thursday and Friday, April 4 and 5, and the Liturgy on Holy Saturday morning, April 6 (also a Resurrection Liturgy). The midnight Matins and Liturgy will be held in Dunedin beginning at 11.30 p.m.

  (We have heard that there may be catastrophic changes to the NZR bus services. These may cause a revision of the above plans).



                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
 


The Epiphany, January 6, fell on a Sunday this year, and we were able to go down together to the river and hold the blessing of waters, followed by a picnic. The following is the sermon preached that morning.

HOMILY ON THE EPIPHANY

   Let us look first at the reading from the Epistle to Titus. Here we find a remarkable text that sums up what we are about today (2,13):

  Looking  for that blessed hope, and the glorious appearing of our great God and Saviour Jesus Christ.

  What a strong assertion of the Godhead of Christ we have here! And we also have here the word EPIPHANY, translated as "appearing": It is a great pity that Fr. Nassar follows the version of the King James translators who, misled by their own doctrinal timidity or perhaps by the absence of the article in the Latin version, give the absurd version: the great God AND OUR Savior Jesus Christ. Fortunately the RSV follows the only possible reading of the Greek: ten EPIPHANEIAN tou megalou Theou kai Soteros emon Iesou Christou. Hardly anywhere else in the New Testament do we have such a bold statement of his Divinity; and today we celebrate the appearing  of  that Divinity. In the west, since very early times, the event emphasized in this feast is the appearing to the wise men - that being the Gospel and the theme of the hymns etc in the Latin services; in the Greek world, today's Gospel celebrates His baptism by John; but both celebrate His Divine Epiphany, or, to telescope the words as the East has now done for centuries, His Theophany or God - appearing.

   Let us look now at the Gospel, where S. John Baptist points out to Jesus that things are upside-down and back to front: John is asked to baptize Jesus, whereas Jesus ought to be baptizing John. And He did, of course - but he did not need to baptize John in water, since he was baptized in his own blood at the hands of Herod as a martyr (witness) of Truth. John's baptism did not wash from sins and give the new birth, and John and all after him have needed the baptism of Christ to enter the Kingdom of Heaven.

  Jesus persuades John with the words: Let it be so, to fulfil all righteousness. Thise is an Hebraic phrase, meaning something like: to observe the righteous law totally. But for the purpose of our feast they can also mean: to let righteousness expand and fill all things.. This is what our Lord did by being baptized on the Jordan. It is not only between John and Jesus that the roles are reversed; they are reversed between Jesus and the Jordan too. Rivers usually wash people; but on this case it is Jesus who washes the Jordan by being baptized in it. Water washes; but today Jesus washes the water. And this water, washed by Jesus, flows on, down into the sea (the Dead Sea) and up into the clouds from which it washes down all the mountains and rivers and plains and seas and oceans of the whole planet stained by sin. As we walk down the Ashley and do the great blessing of water today, we renew this washing by our Lord's grace, not only of the human race, but of the whole world which is our home. We asked that His grace and peace flow down the Ashley into the Pacific and all oceans and wash the world clean from the lust for power which so threatens our world and which is the great obstacle to the knowledge of God and participation in His Kingdom.
  Let us pray that his grace may fall on all those lands around the Jordan, esspecially, over which a sword has been hanging for so many years (at least since the second world war). I read the other day in THE WORD a collection of interesting facts, includung the suprising statement that of the one million Palestinians still left within the borders of the "State of Israel", 80%, or 800,000, are Christians. This is the exact opposite of most of the middle east where, on average, 20% are Christians and 80% are Muslims. So we have an additional reason to pray that it may not be a sword that falls on those lands, but a gentle rain of Christ's grace. And let us pray too that the water that we bless and which flows onto the sea may wash our coasts, our mountains, plains and rivers here in New Zealand and make our whole country, and us all in it full of the faith and love and gentleness and peace of Jesus Christ. Amen.



Fr Jack Witbrock, KENT HOUSE,
45-63 Canterbury Street, ASHLEY,
No. 2 R.D.,Rangiora. Tel.
(0502) 35673


    Invaded three times in his century and in the previous century by Napoleon, the Soviets are understandably touchy about their security. When their border areas are perceived to be vulnerable the Soviets have not hesitated to act against them as quickly as possible. We have rightly condemned these invasions ( Hungary 1956, Czechoslovakia 1968, Afganistan 1980) as morally wrong, cruel and insensitive. This behavior, certainly undemocratic, does not account for the anti-Russian hysteria.

 What accounts for this irrationality? Former ambassador to Russia, George Kennan maintains that "the image of Russia poised and yearning to attack the West... was largely a creation of weatern imagination." Why did the notion of this "Soviet menace" arise?

  After the Second World War had ended, Europe was exausted. The United States alone had survived wartime devastation. And indeed they had survived very well. Ambassador Kennan made this very plain in 1948: "We are six per cent of the world's populaton and we consume fifty per cent of the world's resources. For this to continue we will have to throw our lot in with dictators all around the world."
 
  Since the United States had at its founding stones the most impressive democratic principles, they could not accept the judgement of some of their own best critics that even they had imperial tendencies. To justify their behaviour, the "Soviet scare" in the past was vigorously promoted.  It was Senator Arthur Vandenberg, the leader of the Senate who phrased it best in 1947.  "It is necessary to scare the hell out of the American people."  This is one of the reasons why the Soviets became the scape-goats.

   The Soviets as we have seen had their own deep recovery problems and while it is certainly true that the persecutions under Joseph Stalin in the late 1930's were barbarous to the extreme, the Soviets had their plate full of their own domestic woes.

   And so the drum beat continued: the Soviets were the new Nazis.  Though this was quite inaccurate, it served to justify the permanent war economy.  And behind all of this was the grand trump card: the Bomb.

   Any dictator, no matter how cruel to his own people, or scornful of democratic principles, as long as he said he was "anti-communist," often qualified fo American support.

   A parade of totalitarian dictators, as bad as any in the Soviet Union rose and fell: Batista in Cuba, Trujillo in the Dominican Republic, Somoza in Nicaragua, the Shah in Iran.  All staunch "anti-communists."

   For the next thirty-five years repeated war scares perpetuated the war system.  Organised labour was kept silent by defence contracts; the best scientific minds were squandered in preparing greater and greater weapons.



"We are six per cent of the worlds population and we consume fifty per cent of the world's resources.  For this to continue, we will have to throw in our lot with dictators all around the world."

   In the '50's there was "the bomber gap"; the '60's brought "the missile gap" and the '80's "the window of vulnerability."  Senator Robert Taft in the '40's said that "he was a bit tired of having the Russian menace invoked as a reason for doing any and everything that might and might not be desirable or necessary on its own merits."

   John Foster Dulles, the author of "mass retaliation" and certainly no dove, in 1949 admitted that "I do not know any responsible official, military of civilian in this government, or any government who believes that the Soviet government plans conquest by open military aggression."  General Douglas MacArthur in 1957 claimed: "Our government has kept us in a perpetual state of fear - kept us in a continuous stampede of patriotic fervour - with the cry of a grave national emergency... Yet in retrospect, these disasters seem never to have happened, seem never to be quite real."

   Twenty years after MacArthur, Democratic Senator George McGovern made the same point: "We have had an unrelenting barrage of scare stories for more than a year.  There has hardly been a respite from the stream of reports about Soviet monster missiles, dramatically boosted estimates of Soviet defence spending, Soviet efforts to overtake us on nuclear technology, the mammoth Soviet navy and assorted 'clear and present dangers' to our national safety."                                  

-part of an article in "The Messanger of St. Anthony", Padua, Italy

 The above article has been in our files some time.  We think it worth quoting now, not so much for the opinions expresses, which have been heard before, as for the quotations - which may shed light  on current reporting.

<>

Since this photo was taken at Kiwitea (c.1980), Fr Ambrose and Fr Nicholas have appeared somewhat as birds of passage.  It is therefore with some satisfaction that we have just received an address which we may hope will be permanent and will enable them to serve God in prayer and make the faith known in the heart of Wellington:

      Fr Ambrose,
                           Serbian Orthodox Chapel,
            70 Webb Street,
     Wellington.
             Tel (04) 842 884

(Fr Nicholas hopes to finish his farm work and move to Wellington in a few months).

[The colour original of the above photo appears to be lost. If any one has it and can send it to me, I shall  restore it.Meanwhile I have inserted the photos below which I think were taken a few years earlier.]

                    
DIAMOND HARBOUR,  the Nativity of our Lady - Sept 8, 1990                   



  A first Divine Liturgy was celebrated in the new library/chapel which Mitchell and Colleen Elder have built in the grounds of their home.  These two photos give some idea of the layout and the very tasteful decoration.
   The chapel is aleady used for daily devotions, and we hope to have a Liturgy there from time to time.  Twenty people were present at the Liturgy, which was followed by a barbeque in the grounds and house.
[Once again, the colour original appears to be lost and I hope someone may find and return it. Meanwhile I have inserted one taken at the same time of approximately the same scene.]



  From time to time we have considered holding services in Christchuch city in case distance may be discouraging people from coming to church.  Indeed for some months we held a Liturgy every six weeks in Cathedral Grammer Chapel, and a baptism and two weddings have been held there.  But the attendance was really no better than at Ashley (11 on the last, at Easter 1989).  It may be interesting to list attendances over the last six months for Ashley and Dunedin (present, communicants):

ASHLEY       DUNEDIN       ASHLEY       DUNEDIN

                                                                                                 9, 7                                          9, 8
                                                                                                 7, 4                                                                12, 10
                                                                                               10, 8                                        11, 7
                                                                                                                       8, 6                   7, 4
                                                                                                 6, 5                                         7, 1
                                                                                                 4, 2                                                                 22, 8
                                                                                               10, 7                                        10, 7
                                                                                                11, 9                   7, 6
                                                                                                  7, 5                                         5, 5
                                                                                                11, 8                                                                   7, 3
                                                                                                  6, 2                                          9, 8
                                                                                                20, 6                                          6, 5
                                                                                                11, 8                                          7, 5
                                                                                                  8, 4                                        13, 9

  Partly because it is already very well covered in its parish magazine "The Antiochian" we have not so far mentioned our S. Ignatius' parish in Auckland.  It would however be remiss not to mention the progress being made there.  Attendances, we understand, are better than those above combined - partly owing to the advantage of having the population of the entire South Island within driving distance; but also owing largely to the devoted and untiring efforts of our dear Fr Ilian.  His address: 1/58 Alford st, Waterview, Auckland. Tel. (09) 884 449. (Church: 5 Alford St).

 next issue
Welcome Page
 Ashley Page
 Spotlight front page